| 摘要: |
| 从体育学的角度看,围棋属于人类社会中静态类型的竞争性教育体系,具有丰富的战略性、战术性和身体性元素。围棋中的战略偏重宏观性、对应性与机变性,其战术偏重微观性、动态性与象征性。围棋带有深刻的东亚文化特质,围棋中的棋子没有角色分工的差异,其抽象性和战略性很强,在学科归类上更近于数学,可以隐括现代社会中所有大型化的集团竞争模式。围棋的大局观与人类社会中的外交理念更为相似,两者展现的是一种有关进退、聚散、攻守、显隐之类的对应性概念的流动机理。围棋的辩证性充满了原始的简约性变通品格。韬光养晦的生活理念揭示的是一种进退理念,其与围棋的行棋过程很相似。围棋的势变化本身就是一种宏观性战略符号的表征。围棋中还包括一种显著的和合理念,体现出儒家文明中庸思想的价值取向。 |
| 关键词: 围棋 人类学 大局观 外交实践 东亚文明 |
| DOI： |
| 投稿时间：2024-03-10 |
| 基金项目: |
|
| The Culturology of Go:A Metaphor of Overall Perspective, Diplomatic Practice and East Asian Civilization |
| LU Yunting |
| (Shanghai University of Sport, School of Journalism and Communication,Shanghai 200438 ,China) |
| Abstract: |
| From the perspective of sports science, Go belongs to the static type of competitive educa-tion system in human society, with rich strategic, tactical and physical elements. The strategy in Goemphasizes macro level, correspondence, and variability while its tactics emphasize micro level, dynamics,and symbolism. Go has profound East Asian cultural characteristics. There is no difference inthe division of roles in Go. It is very abstract and strategic. It is closer to mathematics in subject classificationand can cover all the large-scale group competition models in modern society. The overallperspective of Go is more similar to the diplomatic concept in human society. The two show a flowmechanism of corresponding concepts such as advance and retreat, gathering and dispersing, attackand defense, and explicitness and implicitness. The potential power in the change of strategy of Go itselfis a representation of a macro strategic symbol. Go also includes a significant concept of harmonyand integrity, reflecting the value orientation of the doctrine of the mean in Confucian civilization |
| Key words: Go anthropology overall perspective diplomatic practice East Asian civilization |
