| 摘要: |
| 法治中国背景下，对学生体育运动伤害问题进行法理审视显得格外重要。对两份民事判决书进行对比分析发现：两起课外青少年校园运动伤害案，案情相似且两地法院均适用公平责任原则，却出现不同的判罚结果。在此基础上进行法理探析：当冲突发生后，法律作为一种社会控制手段理应得到人们的尊崇，然而法官如何合理行使自由裁量权，使个人利益与社会利益在博弈困境中得到妥善平衡，则需要一个明确的价值尺度和更为先进的法律制度来划定界限。对此，呼吁在我国案例指导制度下努力将学生体育运动伤害案例纳入“指导性案例”。 |
| 关键词: 青少年 课外体育运动 伤害 司法裁判 法理 |
| DOI： |
|
| 基金项目:中国教育学会2017年度教育科研“体育与卫生”专项重点课题“法治视域下学生体育运动伤害风险防控的理论与实践研究”（17TY2231011ZA） |
|
| Thoughts on Judicial Judgement of Campus Extracurricular Sports Injury——Jurisprudential Analysis Based on Two Civil Judgments |
| HUO Dingpeng |
| (Shaanxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Xi’an 712046) |
| Abstract: |
| Under the background of rule of law in China, it is particularly important to examine the problem of sports injuries among students from the perspective of jurisprudence. The comparative analysis of the two civil judgments shows that the two cases of extracurricular teenagers’ campus sports injuries were similar and both courts applied the principle of fair liability, but there were different penalty results. On this basis, the jurisprudence analysis is carried out: when conflicts occur, the law as a means of social control should be respected by people; however, how to exercise the discretion reasonably and make the interests of individuals and society balance properly in the predicament of game requires a clear value scale and more advanced legal system to delimit boundaries. In this regard, we call for efforts to incorporate student sports injury cases into “guiding cases” under the case guidance system in China. |
| Key words: teenagers extracurricular sports injury judicial adjudication Jurisprudence |
