| 摘要: |
| 因人而异的智能健身服务以个性化的个人数据采集与利用为基础，其在为用户提供科学指导、带来便利的同时，也易产生各类数据安全问题。认为，传统的“可识别性”个人数据界定与保护方式已失效，“知情－同意”原则被冗长专业的条款架空形同虚设，数据背后的经济价值归属争议引发“控制性”危机，相关立法和司法的滞后难以提供法律保障，智能健身个人数据保护问题亟待解决。提出，要坚持强化数据主体的控制这一总原则，坚持明确治理主体，完善事后救济的监管路径，坚持以技术为支撑，完善技术解决方案的市场路径，最终形成法律与技术双管齐下、相互配合的“监管-技术”的双重保护路径，以更好地保护健身领域的个人数据。 |
| 关键词: 智能健身 个人数据 保护 知情—同意 监管 技术 |
| DOI： |
|
| 基金项目:国家社会科学基金重大项目“《中华人民共和国体育法》修改重大问题的法理学研究”（18ZDA330）；福建省社科项目“健康中国背景下福建省社区体育发展模式研究”（FJ2018B105） |
|
| Dilemma and Path：Protection of Personal Data Under Intelligent Fitness Mode |
| XU Weikang |
| (School of Law, Tsinghua University, Beijng 100084, China) |
| Abstract: |
| The intelligent fitness service is based on the personal data collection and utilization, which provides scientific guidance and convenience for users, and also easily produces various data security problems. The author thinks that the traditional definition and protection of “identifiable” personal data has been invalid, the principle of “informconsent” has been performed practically no function by tediously long professional terms, the dispute of economic value ownership behind the data has caused a “controlling” crisis, the lag of relevant legislation and judicature cannot provide legal protection, and the problem of intelligent fitness personal data protection needs to be solved. It is proposed that we should adhere to the general principle of strengthening the control of the data subject, adhere to the clear governance of subject, improve the supervision path of expost relief, insist on the technology as the support to improve the market path of technical solutions, and finally form the dual protection path of “supervision technology” of law and technology, so as to better protect the personal data in the field of fitness. |
| Key words: intelligent fitness personal data protection inform consent supervision technology |
